A sermon by Kim
Fabricius
Text: Luke 18:15-30
Text: Luke 18:15-30
The following is a sermon published by Kim Fabricius, pastor at a reformed church in Swansea in the South of Wales. This sermon touched my heart and I re-post it by permission of the author so that it might be a blessing to others. One note; this sermon was preached quite some time ago, and the use of the word 'queer' is not meant in a derogatory sense given the particular cultural usage and context. It is set in a context of the acceptance for all LGBT+ in the church of Jesus Christ. May this sermon bless you as it did me.
“The trouble with kids today…” “When I was their age…”
“Remember the days when…”
Get the picture? Old people talking about young people.
And ever has it been so between one generation and the next.
Old folk look back and see the time of their own youth if not as a golden age,
then certainly as a better age than the world of today’s little creeps. We tend
to view time from the then to the now as one of decline and fall. And young
people, in turn, look at grown-ups and see people out of touch, who don’t
understand them, who don’t understand anything. One word sums it up: we’re
“boring”, and, if you’re parents, you’re “embarrassing” too. “The young think
the old are fools, and the old know the young are fools” – that’s one George
Chapman, writing four hundred years ago! Plus ça change, plus la même chose.* “Whatever,” teenagers would add!
Me, I think this is a healthy state of affairs – at least
for the young. Kids who don’t go through a period of viewing their elders with
– well, the range is from condescending hilarity to lofty contempt – kids who
don’t go through a stage of alienation and – yes, rebellion – they’re missing
out on an essential part of the human experience. Indeed a younger generation
that doesn’t set itself against their elders bodes ill for the time when they
will become the older generation. For does not every generation of young people
have something to be angry about and rebellious against? Has not every
generation of parents left their children a world in a worse state than the one
that was bequeathed to them by their parents? Do we not therefore warrant the
accusation that we have screwed things up, and today, given the ominous state
of the ecology, screwed things up big-time? The rebellion of the young, I’m
suggesting, is, at heart, of moral significance, with its idealism, energy, and
can-do optimism, in contrast to the quite immoral cynicism and complacency
that, alas, inevitably seems to set in with thinning hair and sagging
bottoms.
Which is why I am a worried man. No, not because my hair is
thinning and my bottom has long since sagged and dropped – though that is true!
No, I am worried by what I take to be a distinct lack of rebelliousness in
today’s young people. Instead of repudiating and bucking the system, the system
has sucked them in. They’ve become its biggest fans. The in-your-face
self-expressiveness of young people, always an essential element of their
identity – it strikes me as so conventional, conformist even, it smacks of the
manufactured and manipulated. By whom? By us older people, of course! By the
marketers, advertisers, and commercial providers. Young people have become,
fundamentally, economic units, consumers, defined, indeed defining themselves,
by their spending power.
(Are you aware, by the way, just how recent a phenomenon
youth culture is? It only started after the Second World War, and only began
really to kick in during the late-fifties and sixties. Pocket money and
ever-increasing amounts of it – that is, available capital, purchasing power –
and the rise of a distinct youth culture: they go hand in hand.)
Does the
irony escape you? We lament that children today grow up too fast when in fact
the whole project is being funded by adults! Check out the magazines kids read:
they’re adolescent versions of the glossy world of fame, fashion, and ersatz
beauty that obsesses and drives the twenty-to-fifty-somethings. And so the
advertising industry quite rightly treats the purchasing public as such as
children. For the flipside of children growing up too quickly is adults not
growing up at all – we have become infantilised. That’s what money and ennui
will do to you. But savvy kids should know better.
Which leads me to point out the interesting juxtaposition of
passages in today’s New Testament reading. On the one hand, there is the story
of Jesus blessing the children who come to him; on the other hand, there is the
story of the rich man who walks away from Jesus. The juxtaposition is hardly
arbitrary, and it’s one of contrast and critique.
Jesus is talking about how a
person enters the kingdom, or reign, of God. Not how to get to “heaven”, but how
to become part of the world God wants it to be, a world of peace, justice, and
love, the world Jesus came to announce and inaugurate. How? Answer: by
receiving it like a child. But what particular childlike quality does Jesus
have in mind? Not, I can tell you, innocence or humility. We’re talking real
kids here, not Teletubbies! There was nothing sentimental about Jesus’ view of
children; Jesus was no Victorian romanticist. Indeed if the text suggests
anything about children it is their weakness and helplessness – they have to be
brought to Jesus. No money, no possessions, no position, no power – these are
the things that make them role models for the kingdom. Interesting that. We’re
always banging on about children needing adult role models, whereas our Lord
thinks just the reverse: it’s adults who need children as role models.
And
this interpretation – that it’s children’s pennilessness and powerlessness that
make them role models for the kingdom – this interpretation is confirmed by the
following story of the rich man. For here is the proverbial man who has
everything – and observe that he is a good man too, he keeps the commandments,
he is a pillar of the community, a member of the Rotary Club or the Round Table
– yet so possessed is he by his possessions that he is quite unable to enter
the kingdom of God, which demands dis-possession – demands weakness, not
strength, demands helplessness, not control.
But as I have suggested, today’s kids would seem to have
more in common with the rich man than the child. Just look at the possessions –
from designer clothes, to mobile phones, to personal computers. And odd though
it may at first sound, they’ve got the power to go with them – and it comes by
via the tacit permission of their parents. Just think of the manifesto of the
famous Spice Girls – Girl Power – and think of their target audience, the
target audience, for that matter, of all girl and boy bands:
ten-to-twelve-year-olds. And think of how parents, in oblivious obeisance to
the market economy, and to keep the domestic peace, collude in turning their
children into shoppers.
I know, I’m beginning to sound like the old man I
began with: “The trouble with kids today …” I don’t mean to. Rather I’m simply
trying to sketch out the reality of youth culture today, which strikes me as
virtually the same as the virtual reality of adult culture today. Consumerism
is the common theme: the commodification of everything that moves, the itching
and scratching of restless, insatiable desire, the celebration of ever-expanding
choice, choice, and more choice. Isn’t this our common reality? It is little
Matthew’s reality too.
HOWEVER: whenever we baptise a child in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, baptise him/her into Christ, we initiate him/her into a different reality, an alternative reality, a counter-cultural reality we call the church. At least that’s the theory. Because you and I both know that, in practice, on the whole, Christians are as mesmerised as non-Christians by the idol of consumerism.
HOWEVER: whenever we baptise a child in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, baptise him/her into Christ, we initiate him/her into a different reality, an alternative reality, a counter-cultural reality we call the church. At least that’s the theory. Because you and I both know that, in practice, on the whole, Christians are as mesmerised as non-Christians by the idol of consumerism.
NEVERTHELESS: here you are, and here a few of us come, week by week, to see and hear the church “fess up”: to laugh at the pretensions of consumer capitalism’s ridiculous little gods, to expose the lies the world lives by, to tell it like it is to each other in love, even when it hurts, and to practice the quaint and lost arts of forgiveness and peacemaking when violence and vengeance make all the running with the good guys and bad guys alike. And there is no bouncer at the door. All are welcome here without distinction – saints and sinners, losers and winners, the poor and the wealthy, the ugly and the beautiful, the queer and the supposedly normal. Because here the good news of God’s foolish, prodigal, disarming love is proclaimed, as we try to keep alive the rumour of an altogether different God from the one you will find anywhere else, the God who passes judgement on wealth and power, valorises the vulnerable, and calls us into a community of belonging, need, and care. And so today we not only baptise little Matthew, we also hold him up as the very embodiment of the gospel of Jesus Christ. If we want to enter the kingdom of God, we will get in line behind him.
Reposted from Faith and Theology
Faith and Theology
* an epigram by Jean Baptiste Karr meaning "the more things change, the more things stay the same"
Reprinted by permission of Myers and Fabricius
Article by Kim Fabricius
Faith and Theology linkOther articles by Benjamin Myers and Kim Fabricius can be found at the "Faith and Theology" blog at the link above.
* an epigram by Jean Baptiste Karr meaning "the more things change, the more things stay the same"
Reprinted by permission of Myers and Fabricius
Article by Kim Fabricius
Faith and Theology linkOther articles by Benjamin Myers and Kim Fabricius can be found at the "Faith and Theology" blog at the link above.
Check out other articles, book recommendation, books, and musings of two humble but great theologians at the link "Faith and Theology"
No comments:
Post a Comment