Translate

Wednesday, September 28, 2016

En-Gedi Scroll Deciphered

A team of researchers have unlocked an early Hebrew scroll from Leviticus by the use of an incredible new technology.  An excavation found a burned lump of animal skin scrolls in a jar, but a new technology enabled scientists to uncover the writing of the book, revealing the earliest copy of Leviticus found.  Only a few lines were recovered, but this technology enabled an almost impossibly burnt scroll to come back to life.  See video below for the scientific imaging technique.

The portion of Leviticus Lev 1:1-9, and Leviticus 2:2-11 covers three important voluntary offerings that Israelites brought in worship.  The first, the full burnt offering, is covered in verses 1: 1-9, the second is the grain offering, 2: 2-11, and the third is the peace offering, 3:1-7.  There are two important words to focus on, "offering" and "sacrifice."  "Offering" comes from the root word which means "to draw near."  The word "sacrifice" denotes something that is set apart for the Lord, sanctified, or made holy.  The purpose of the offering  was to draw near to God in order to bring reconciliation or peace between God and the offerer.  It was the role of the priest alone to bring the blood and sprinkle it on the sides of the altar (1:5), without this blood there would be no atonement for sin.  The grain offering, unlike the burnt offering, did not require death, it came as an offering from the produce of the soil and was mixed with olive oil a symbol of God's Spirit.  This offering symbolized the dedication to God of one's life, especially our labor and resources.  The third, is the peace offering or the "well-being" offering.  This offering included a sacrificial meal, parts of the offering were given to the priest (7:30-34) and the rest was eaten by the offerer, and their family and friends. This offering could be made as a thanksgiving offering as well.

Offerings were brought voluntarily, and come from a heart of gratitude and from a covenant relationship with God.  We know that as humans we constantly struggle with faults and defects that result in our hurting God and others.  We are not perfect, nor will we ever be, and we are often blinded by our own destructive behaviors, completely oblivious as to how it affects those around us.  Too often, Christians believe that once they come to faith, sin is a thing of the past, that Christians are "new creatures" and so therefore should no longer display any of the old past behaviors and sin.  The Levitical system of offerings and sacrifices demonstrates that on the contrary, God instructed Israel to have in place a vehicle by which reconciliation to God and others is possible.  By offering ourselves to God, and by recognizing and confessing our daily sin, we are able to be forgiven, and in turn to forgive others.  If so great a debt is forgiven to us by God, how can we not turn and forgive those around us of the things they have done to hurt us?  Refusing to forgive our sisters and brothers who sin against us is the same as turning away from the grace and mercy that God gives to us.

Today, our offerings are part of our worship to God.  Christians recognize that Jesus, in the mystery of the atonement, gave his own life, freely and voluntarily as an offering to God for the salvation of humanity, we also recognize that our response of giving of ourselves in grateful thanksgiving.  Jesus made it possible for us to be reconciled and forgiven by God and in turn to forgive others.  Our Christian lives should be marked by the grateful giving of ourselves to God and others. We bring offerings, monetary, or of our talents and time, we bring bread and wine to the table, in an act of thanksgiving for the salvation given to us in Jesus Christ.   Most importantly, we bring of ourselves as a gift to God humbly submitting to God's gracious rule in our lives.  Many churches are entering the season where stewardship receives some additional focus.  As we do, let us recall the significance of the "offerings" in the Old Testament and refocus on the meaning of our own offerings to God today.




Column I: Leviticus 1:19
1 1וי̊ק[ראאלמשהוי]̇דב̊ריהוהא̇ל̇יומ̊א[הל] 2 מוע[דלאמר2ד]בראלבניישראלוא̊מ[רת] 3 א̇ל̇ה[םאדם]כייקריבמכםקרבןליהו̊ה[מן] 4 הבהמה ̇מ̇ן ̇הבקר [ו]מן הצאן תקריבו ̊א ̇ת 5 קרבנכם 3אם עלה קרבנו מן הבקר זכ ̇ר 6 תמיםיקריבנואלפתחאהלמועדי̇קריב 7 א̇תולרצנולפנייהוה4ו̇ס̊מךידועלראש 8 ה̇ע[ל]הונרצהלולכפר[עליו5ושח]טאתבן 9 ̇ה̊ב̇ק̇רלפנייהוהו̇ה̊קר[יבובני]אהרן 10 [הכ]̊הניםאת̊ה̇דםו[ז]ר̇ק[ואתהדם]עלהמזבח 11 [סבי]ב אשר פ ̇תח אהל ̊מ[ועד 6והפשי]ט את 12 [העל]̊הונ̇ת[ח]אתהלנתח[יה7ונתנובני]אהרן 13 [הכה]̊ן אש על ̇המזבח ̇ו[ערכו עצים על ]האש 14 8[וערכ]ו ̇ב ̇ני ̊א ̇הרן הכה[נים את הנתחי] ̇ם את (see source below) 


En-Gedi scroll translation Journal Texts

Journal Textus : translation of En-Gedi scroll

Sic-News Report on Scroll

Archeology

Biblical Archeology Review

Saturday, September 24, 2016

Catholics and Orthodox Sign Agreement





Roman Catholic theologians and Orthodox theologians have signed a historic agreement on synodality and primacy.  The document "Synodality and Primacy in the First Millennium" is an important step in relations between Catholics and Orthodox Christians.  The plenary sessions were held in Italy from Sept 15-22.  The schism goes back thousands of years to the year 1054, in a breach between the Christian East and West.  Some Orthodox remain staunchly opposed to dialogue with Rome, while others realize there is still a long road before any kind of unity can be achieved, but see this as an important step.  The Ravenna document in 2007 was a prior document that addresses the unity and authority of the church.  While full communion is still a long way off, these important steps can help Christians work towards reconciliation and communion, and not just for Catholic and Orthodox but for all Christians world wide.

Angelus News

Vatican Radio

Catholic Herald

Ravenna Document: Ecclesial Communion, Conciliarity and Authority

Catholic Conference of Bishop on Ravenna


Tuesday, September 20, 2016

On Faith, Science and Evolution



The Bible, Science and Evolution:

The culture wars between creationism and science comes from the emergence of Fundamentalism in the nineteenth century.  Fundamentalism held that there were new "essentials" of the faith.  Rather than reverting to the historic Christian creeds, these new "fundamentals" stressed a literal interpretation of scripture and ultimately creationism as a logical step.  They developed as a reaction to secularism and new understandings in science that were emerging.  This has led to the unfortunate belief among many Christians that creation "science" is a doctrinal essential for "bible believing" Christians.  Nothing could be further from the truth.


Although this topic is a large one, and the integration of faith and science has many avenues that need to be explored, I would like to just highlight a few very basic but important ideas for Christians to consider in this debate.  First, this is an area of Christian freedom of conscience.  Although I believe that a literal twenty-four hour creationism or "young earth" view is extraordinarily misguided, Christians hold multiple views on the relationship between the creation accounts in Genesis and modern views of evolution.  Paul admonished his audience to allow freedom of conscience in non essential matters of faith (1 Cor 10:29, Rom 14:1-4).  This is one of them.  To insist, however, on a literal view of Genesis as a marker of fidelity to scripture is a doctrinal error that causes division and unnecessary disunity in the body of Christ.  Multiple interpretations of the book of Genesis exist and have existed throughout the history of the church.  The early church fathers often accepted an interpretation of scripture and Genesis that was allegorical in nature (see "Beginnings: Ancient Christian Readings of the Bible Creation Narratives Peter C Bouteneff; professor of theology at St. Vladimir Orthodox Theological Seminary).

Second, Evolution is not a threat to either the authority of scripture or the idea that God is the Creator of all that exists.  Evolution does not automatically equal atheism.  Many Christian denominations hold something similar to this statement from the Presbyterian church, "neither Scripture, our Confessions of Faith, nor our Catechism, teach the Creation of man by the direct and immediate act of God so as to exclude the possibility of evolution as scientific theory." (PCUS 1969).  The PCUSA catechism states that "natural science has much to teach us about the particular mechanisms and process of nature, but it is not in a position to answer these questions about ultimate reality, which points to mysteries that science as such is not equipped to explore.  Nothing basic to the Christian faith contradicts the findings of modern science nor does anything essential to modern science contradict the Christian faith." (PCUSA catechism).  I have provided links at the end of this article to numerous Christian denominations stance on science and faith. 

Favoring a view more compatible with Science

Third, there are very good reasons to hold views that are more compatible with what we now about the natural world through science as a methodology.  A typical definition of evolution describes the phenomena as a natural process by which the emergence of complex life forms developed through genetic mutation, natural selection, breeding, environmental stimulus, and cell division.  It is possible to see this as an act of God, as creator and sustainer of the universe, through the eyes of faith.   When Christians understand that what we learn from science does not contradict our belief in a living Creator, we provide a way forward in which people do not have to choose between science or their faith.  Too often people have been forced to either reject their faith and embrace science or else embrace their faith and reject science.  This is a false dichotomy.  We can learn about the natural world through science and still believe in God as creator.  


Last of all, our view of scripture has to be one that recognizes the culture and history in which God's revelation comes.  Scripture always comes to us in a specific time and place, for example, Abraham was a nomadic herder who lived during the bronze age.  The people we meet in scripture would have naturally held the cosmology of their day, we cannot expect them to see the world in the same way that we see it.  In a sense, communicating truth through myth, poetry, story, or saga, as is characteristic of the early part of the book of Genesis, is perhaps one of the best vehicles of communicating timeless truth through different cultures and worldviews across the world.  Everyone understands story, whether someone is living in modern European countries or in traditional tribal cultures that still exist around the world (creation, fall, redemption, new creation).  Both Augustine and John Calvin held favorable views of the science of their day, and those instances where the church was threatened by science, such as in the case of Galileo stand as cautionary tales of the church ending up on the wrong side of history, (or the wrong side of truth).

Much of this issue revolves around the ways in which Christians interpret the book of Genesis.  It is possible to be faithful to the truth of scripture and interpret the early part of Genesis in a vehicle that communicates truth, but does not do so as a document recounting the creation of the earth in a 144 hour period.   In other words, hippopotami, elephants, dinosaurs, simply pop into existence, and Adam materializes into existences as a fully formed adult male.  Christians should hold the scriptures as the authoritative word of God, but this also requires the task of faithfully interpreting scripture, including its literary genre, structure, and ultimately the truth that it communicates.  There is room for our understanding of the processes of the natural world.  

When we become sidetracked by trying to prove certain elements in Genesis could have been historic realities, we begin to miss the larger picture and theological message of the book.  In some Bible commentators obsession to prove for example, that Jonah was really swallowed by a large fish, feverishly examining early American whaleboats encounters for historical accounts of whalers who were eaten by a whale and found alive, to prove the story "true." Yet, they miss the critical part of the Jonah story, God's message of mercy towards the non-Jewish Nineties.  Even in portions of scripture that are clearly historical documents, we must still look for the deeper theological message of the book.  

As Christians who are people of truth, it is critical that we allow science to be science.  By its very nature, science produces hypothesis that have to be tested, experiments that use empirical data to qualify results and draw conclusions.  There is no way that a belief in God as a creator, or even the belief that everything miraculously appeared in the universe fully formed in a 144 hours period fits any scientific category.  Therefore, in the science classroom it has to be rejected.   This is why many Christian educators and clergy as well as others from different religious backgrounds have gone on the record endorsing the teaching of science and evolution in the classroom and rejecting religious notions such as intelligent design or creationism.  

The Clergy Letter Project is a statement that has signatories from numerous Christian and other religions, that affirms and supports the teaching of evolution in the classrooms.  This is essential in helping students not just remain competitive around the world, but understand the many ways that science (as a method of uncovering truth), has helped us to see our world.  As Christians, we are people of truth.  We know that God it truth, and therefore all truth is God's truth.  As Christians we should not have to fear the truth.  We should be people of truth.  As such it is important that we remain open to those areas where we have much to learn about our world from science.  As Neil deGrass Tyson often quotes, "the bible tells us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go."

The Clergy Letter Project Statement from Christian Clergy:
Within the community of Christian believers there are areas of dispute and disagreement, including the proper way to interpret Holy Scripture. While virtually all Christians take the Bible seriously and hold it to be authoritative in matters of faith and practice, the overwhelming majority do not read the Bible literally, as they would a science textbook. Many of the beloved stories found in the Bible – the Creation, Adam and Eve, Noah and the ark – convey timeless truths about God, human beings, and the proper relationship between Creator and creation expressed in the only form capable of transmitting these truths from generation to generation. Religious truth is of a different order from scientific truth. Its purpose is not to convey scientific information but to transform hearts. 
We the undersigned, Christian clergy from many different traditions, believe that the timeless truths of the Bible and the discoveries of modern science may comfortably coexist. We believe that the theory of evolution is a foundational scientific truth, one that has stood up to rigorous scrutiny and upon which much of human knowledge and achievement rests. To reject this truth or to treat it as “one theory among others” is to deliberately embrace scientific ignorance and transmit such ignorance to our children. We believe that among God’s good gifts are human minds capable of critical thought and that the failure to fully employ this gift is a rejection of the will of our Creator. To argue that God’s loving plan of salvation for humanity precludes the full employment of the God-given faculty of reason is to attempt to limit God, an act of hubris. We urge school board members to preserve the integrity of the science curriculum by affirming the teaching of the theory of evolution as a core component of human knowledge. We ask that science remain science and that religion remain religion, two very different, but complementary, forms of truth.

Clergy Letter Project

Roman Catholic Statement to the Members of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences

Roman Catholic Encyclical "Humani Generis"

National Catholic Reporter

ELCA "Ask a Scientist"

Episcopal Church "A Catechism of Creation"

PCUSA approves Clergy Letter Project 2016

United Methodist Links on Evolution and Science

United Church of Christ

Judaism

Islam

Friday, September 16, 2016

The Barmen Declaration and the Cross and the Swastika



The Theological Declaration of Barmen 1934 was a document adopted by the Reformed and Lutheran churches that opposed Nazi Germany and the view of the “German Christians” which combined the authority of church and state. Many German Christians openly welcomed Hitler's Nazi party to power, they believed that it was a historic movement of Christ's work on earth through the Aryan people.  The German Christians welcomed the turning point of 1933 as a gift and miracle of God. 1

The “German Christians” went on to organize churches in Germany under one single, national church under the leadership of one national bishop. On September 27, 1933 a new constitution established a single “Protestant Reich Church”. The Declaration of Barmen was a confession written by the Confessing Christians that opposed this new national church government and Hitler's totalitarian rule.   In two articles, the Barmen Confession affirmed the false doctrine of uniting church and state under one authority...

8.23 We reject the false doctrine, as though the State, over and beyond its special commision, should and could become the single and totalitarian order of human life, thus fulfilling the Church's vocation as well.

8.24 We reject the false doctrine, as though the Church, over and beyond its special commission, should and could appropriate the characteristics, the tasks, and the dignity of the State, thus itself becoming an organ of the State.

This establishes strongly in our confessions one more example of the importance of the separation of church in state and Christians today need to be particularly aware of this important distinctions.

The the book "The Cross and the Swastika", the German Christians declared their belief that Nazism and Christianity were not just compatible, but the manifestation of God's revelation.  To this, Karl Barth added his strong NO!  Below is an exert from the booklet that is available at the Calvin College archive below.   It demonstrates the dangers and heresy of nationalism.  These statements were written from the view point that Nazism was compatible with Christianity, and that German Nationalism was compatible with Christianity.  This reminds us of the dangers of any kind of Nationalism being mixed with Christianity, including United States Nationalism.  

1http://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/christuskreuz.htm

The Cross and The Swastika: The symbol of the Cross and the Swastika had the following explanation:  

"The cross of Christ and the swastika do not need to oppose each other, and must not do so, but rather they can and should stand together. One should not dominate the other, but rather each should maintain its own meaning and significance.

The cross of Christ points toward heaven and admonishes us:
Remember that you are Christian people, carried by the eternal love of the heavenly father, free through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, sanctified by the power of God’s spirit.

The swastika, however, points to the world as a divine creation and admonishes us: Remember that you are German, born in German territory to parents of German blood, filled with the German spirit and essence, formed according to German nature.

Both together, however, the cross of Christ and the swastika, admonish us: Remember that you are German Christian people and should become ever more whole German Christian people, and remain so!"

Hanover, Easter 1934. Gerhard Hahn, President of the Provincial Church Council (Landeskirchentag)

The publication is available on this website (third party) from Calvin College research archive:

German Propaganda Archive

Barmen Declaration

Monday, September 5, 2016

On a Humane and Christian Immigration Policy

Flight into Egypt 1868 

Immigration has historically been a hot topic, and this election cycle is no different.  Unfortunately, many Christians have too often chosen to ignore, neglect, or simply explain away passage from scripture that doesn't fit our view of the world.  In the Old Testament, God had much to say to Israel about their approach to the foreigner, stranger and alien in the land.  In Scripture, Moses reminds Israel that because they experienced enslavement and oppression while living in a foreign land, their approach should therefore be radically different.  Immigrants should be met with hospitality, justice, and fair pay.  If indeed God owns everything (Ps 24:1) and we have been blessed with God's gifts of grace in life and salvation, we should respond to others, especially foreigners with generosity.  

As Christians we should always be particularly concerned for those that are most economically vulnerable, and these groups can include the disabled, the elderly, the poor, and immigrants.  As such, we as Christians cannot tolerate in our society voices that are reacting towards immigrants with fear and racism.  While anyone that has committed crimes should be prosecuted and their victims compensated, and while we have the right and obligation to secure our borders from terrorists, human traffickers, illegal drugs, and violent persons, and while we have a right to enforce our national immigration policy as a matter of law, we are called to do so with compassion and mercy, both for citizens and for non-citizens.   We have a moral obligation to uphold human rights of all persons.  We also need an immigration policy that is economically realistic.  We should have a procedure whereby those fleeing economic or political oppression in their homelands can become lawful residents here.  We should never criminalize immigration.  We cannot blame the crimes of a few undocumented people on all undocumented people, nor use that as a justification to take away their human rights.  The following scripture verses shows God love and concern for the 'outsider'.

Scripture: all references from the NRSV

I charged your judges at that time: Give the members of your community a fair hearing, and judge rightly between one person and another, whether citizen or resident alien.  Deut 1:16

...Who executes justice for the orphan and the widow, and who loves the strangers, providing them food and clothing.  You shall also love the stranger, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt. Deut 10:18-19

You shall not withhold the wages of poor and needy laborers, whether other Israelites or aliens who reside in your land in one of your towns. You shall pay them their wages daily before sunset, because they are poor and their livelihood depends on them; otherwise they might cry to the LORD against you, and you would incur guilt. Deut 24:14-15

You shall not deprive a resident alien or an orphan of justice; you shall not take a widow’s garment in pledge. Remember that you were a slave in Egypt and the LORD your God redeemed you from there; therefore I command you to do this. Deut 24:17

Cursed be anyone who deprives the alien, the orphan, and the widow of justice.” All the people shall say, “Amen!” Deut 27:19

For if you truly amend your ways and your doings, if you truly act justly one with another, if you do not oppress the alien, the orphan, and the widow, or shed innocent blood in this place, and if you do not go after other gods to your own hurt,  then I will dwell with you in this place, in the land that I gave of old to your ancestors forever and ever.  Jer 7:5-7

The word of the LORD came to Zechariah, saying:  Thus says the LORD of hosts: Render true judgments, show kindness and mercy to one another;  do not oppress the widow, the orphan, the alien, or the poor; and do not devise evil in your hearts against one another.  Zech 7: 8-9

 Little children, let us love, not in word or speech, but in truth and action. 1 John 3:18

Many Christian denominations have had a long tradition of standing for a just immigration policy that rejects xenophobia, racism, and violent towards immigrants.  The following is a summary of key items that an compassionate immigration policy may include.  It is possible to balance both God's love and justice for the migrants as well as protection from those with criminal intentions.

  1. We have a right as a nation to protect our borders and to identify and prevent entry to terrorists and dangerous criminals.
  2. We have a right to set our own immigration policies; however in doing this, we should always have Christian compassion that respects the human rights of groups and individuals. 
  3. We should strive to make policy in line with economic realities, giving opportunities to those that would come for honest work. 
  4. We should call for safe working conditions for workers, and work towards greater economic development in poor countries.
  5. We should strive to keep families together, there is no reason to tear families apart or continue the detention of children.   We should work to create easier legal avenues for workers and families who wish to immigrate to the United States to come and work in an orderly manner that protects both their right and those of citizens.
  6. We should strive for a policy of "advocacy and welcome": to allow an opportunity for hard working immigrants who are already here to come out of the shadow and become lawful residents.
  7. People should always be treated with respect, and consistent with humanitarian values, making sure all migrants have access to due process.  Migration should not be criminalized nor immigrants treated as criminals. 

    Although no immigration policy is perfect, and in the United States competing agendas makes this political process difficult, as Christians, we are called to an even deeper reality than whatever policy is implemented.  We are following the "kingdom principles" that God calls us to embrace.  As such, this become more a matter of our heart and our behavior.  It become a question of how we embrace the people around us, how we think about our world, and where there are areas that the Spirit is still calling us to submit to the Lordship of Christ because we may still harbor prejudice, fear, jealousy, suspicion, or even hatred.  This election season may be a good time for us to examine our hearts and see if we are reflecting the compassion that God has called us to have towards our fellow humans. 






A Sermon on the "Lord's Prayer" Luke 11:1-13


The "Lord's Prayer"
Introduction:
We are looking at the topic of prayer. Two Sunday's ago, we began by pointing out that prayer is something that everyone can do. There is no limit by age or physical condition. Sometimes prayer seems to be the most ineffective thing we can do, certainly not as important as many of the other activities that happen in the church. We are encouraged to pray, and prayer is accessible to everyone. Then we saw the necessity of setting aside time to pray. Mary and Martha story illustrated the importance of finding time to “sit” at the feet of Jesus.  To study, meditate, and pray can refresh our spiritual lives and help us find focus in our daily life. Today, we come to the lectionary passage where Jesus disciples ask him to teach them to pray. Jesus gives us what has come to be called the “Lord's Prayer." 

Three Kinds of Prayer
There are three kinds of prayers that we often encounter in Christian spirituality. First, there are “Breath Prayers."  We are likely not as familiar with them in our tradition. Breath prayers have been used by Christians from the most ancient times. They are used in silent meditation. Often it can be just one word said over and over again, such as the word “Jesus."  Christians are encouraged to sit comfortably, breath in and out and use a breath prayer. A breath prayer can also be a simple portion of scripture, a famous one is called the “Jesus Prayer”. It simply says, “Lord, Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me a sinner.” One is encouraged to follow the natural rhythm of the body and to keep the prayer to about 10-115 minutes time. It is a good way to quite the mind and center one's self.

A second kind of prayer is what some simply called a prayer that “comes from the heart.” Some Christians believe that prayers should always only come from the heart and do not like written prayers as they seem insincere. While on the one hand, simply “talking” to God as we would a friend is certainly the most accessible way to pray, our prayers can sometimes be very selfish, egotistical and self-centered. Sometimes our prayers can reflect our own biases, we can pray in a way that hurts others. This is mostly a concern in public prayers that are prayed freely from the heart. I certainly do not want to discourage Christians from praying from the heart, it is important that we know we can always talk to God whether our talk is “right” or not. We can express our anger and our disappointment, as well as our sadness. But in public prayers, it is often best to go with prayers that have been well known to the church. I am calling these liturgical prayers.

Liturgical prayers are prayers of the church. They are usually prayers that have been used for centuries, some of them go back to the earliest times in Christianity.  Others are simply recognized for their theological insight and pastoral sensitivity.  They are instructive prayers, in that they help us to learn to pray.  The disciples approached Jesus with a request, "Lord, teach us to pray."  The “Lord's Prayer” is such a prayer. The fact that the disciples ask Jesus “how do we pray?” is an acknowledgement that they do not know how to pray but are willing to learn and curious about the question.  The book of James tells us that “You covet because you cannot get what you want, so you quarrel and fight. You do not have because you do not ask God, when you ask, you do not receive because you ask wrongly, in order to spend what you get on your pleasures.” (James 4:2-3)

The Lord's Prayer is what I am calling a Liturgical Prayer. It has been used for centuries and comes directly from Jesus. The original prayer likely does not have the last addition of the closing “for thine is the kingdom...”1 The prayer is given as a model prayer and as a prayer that we can repeat in church. It focuses us on a way that we can pray also a structure that focuses on God, the needs of others, our physical needs and our spiritual needs.  Lets look at a brief description of each of the movements of the prayer, to understand how Jesus directs us to think about our lives when we pray. 

The Lord's Prayer: “Our Father”

The first part of the prayer begins by address God as “Our father, who art in heaven, holy is your name”. This is a reminder that we need to turn to God first, not last. When we are worried our anxious, when we have a decision to make, we can approach God. While God seems to us to be unreachable, (we cannot see or hear God audibly) God remain accessible by faith and humility. God is not us, and we are not God. We cannot confuse our thought and our desires with God's. We come in humility. This is not a false humility or one that denigrates us. Recently I read an article where the author wrote a plea to Pope Francis to remove the liturgical phrase, “I am not worthy to come but only say the word and you will be healed” from the communion liturgy. The phrase comes from the words spoken by a Roman centurion to Jesus who asked for healing for his servant. The writer expressed that these words devalued human life. I think that this is a misunderstanding of the intent. The Roman centurion was an accomplished man, he was recognized by the community not just as a man of authority and power, but one that was generous and charitable. Jesus had specifically been recommended by the religious leaders to heal the man's servants because he of all people deserved it. The response of the centurion was one that reflected his recognition of God's grace freely given to us not because we deserve it, but because we are beloved children of God. This is not about inner self hate. Those of us that have suffered abuse, or live with feelings of powerlessness, those that are undervalued in society should always be assured of God's love and the foundational Christian belief that everyone is created in God's image and have value that is priceless in God's eyes. True humility recognizes that we need to rely on a power higher than our own to lead and guide.

Father” also emphasizes the parental nature of God. No parents are perfect, we love our children in an imperfect way, but God loves us as no parent can. God gives us life and nurtures our life through his life giving Spirit. God directs and guides us through the life of Jesus Christ, and provides for our salvation. God is not masculine, and there are other passages that refer to God as a loving mother as well. 2 God nurtures us as a loving parent nurtures their children. We can and must look to God to orient our lives and to be the foundation from which we live our lives. We come not in a false humility but in the same way a child might approach a parent, knowing that their identity is linked with that of their parent, and that their parent is a source of support and love, as well as protection and guidance.

Your Kingdom Come...

This should be very familiar to us. Jesus always proclaimed God's coming kingdom and rule. On the “sermon on the mount” (Matt 5-7) Jesus spoke about a kingdom rule that we are asked to submit ourselves to. While God's kingdom has come in Jesus we know that there are still forces at play. We do not live in a neutral space, the powers of the evil one are manifested in society, and our own corruption, selfish and self-destructive behaviors are all too evident in our lives. We routinely use manipulation, fear, and self-deception to derail our lives and relationships and deal with the consequences. As Christians we are not immune to this, sin destroys individual lives, communities, and nations. This is a prayer that God's life giving purposes may be claimed on our lives as it is in heaven. That God's kingdom comes to those that choose humility, (poor in spirit), meekness, sorrow (those that mourn), peacemaking, mercy, those that hunger for justice, the pure in heart etc.

Give us this day our daily bread...

This part of the prayer reminds us that we do have material and physical needs. When Israel was wandering in the wilderness, they were fed by manna every day, and were only to take what was needed for that day. This is a reminder of God's daily provision in our lives. I don't believe that this means we should not plan for the future, or that we should not be responsible managers of our property and money. On the other hand, neither should be become obsessive with hoarding, or worrying about the future, and how we are going to protect it from others. Our trust if it is in God alone to meet our needs. This also means that we will be generous in our giving and charitable with others. We have to rely on God's providential care as the source of our security. There is a very interesting spiritual application to this as well. Prayer is an activity that has to be undertaken daily. We really cannot live off the prayers of yesterday, or of the future. Prayer is the kind of activity that happens in the moment, and for the day. Our own spiritual nurture like our physical nurture has to be daily. We take “daily” vitamins. We cannot take an extra one for tomorrow, or rely on the one for yesterday, in the same day, each day should be a day in which we find time to be spiritually renewed even if it is only for a few minutes a day.

Forgive us our sins...

We don't begin with our 'sin' when we start our prayers, because sometimes I think, if we did, God would remind us that its “not all about you.”  We begin with God because this takes the focus off ourselves and places it where it truly belongs.  The part of the prayer, however, now turns and reminds us of our need to be honest before God.  Most of us know that in a given day we will do things that we regret. While we begin with praise, this part of the prayer reminds us of that we routinely hurt others and are hurt by others.   Forgiveness is hard because we often want to get back at people for hurting us.  Jesus asks us to forgive others and in so doing, this brings healing into our lives and keeps us from prolonged anger and bitterness that can eat away at us.   Feelings of hurt, anger, and resentment towards others can only hurt us in the long run. Forgiveness reminds us that we receive from God love and reconciliation and a new start, but also that we can in gratefulness, live to forgive others as we have been forgiven.  

Lead us not into temptation,

Sometimes, this is translated as “save us from the time of trial”.  We know that God does not tempt us, instead, we are tempted, that is when we either desire or follow through with actions that are sinful, by the evil one or by our own selfish tendencies. This prayer is a recognition that God will be able to bring us through the difficult times in the wilderness of our lives, safely.  God can redeem and restore the brokenness of our lives, as our Presbyterian Catechism tells us, "nothing in our lives will go to waste". God can take the sin and evil and bring out of it healing, restoration and new life. We are often enticed to sin, to go back to old behaviors and ways of thinking. It is essential for to remember as Christians that God's life giving Spirit is at work in our lives. We do not have the power in and of ourselves to change, but when our desire is to live in a kingdom life, God makes a way for us to grow in the grace of God every day.  We can and have been delivered from the evil one.  It is said of Martin Luther, that he understood the battle he fought with the evil one and compared him to a changed dog.  "Why should you fear?  Why should you be afraid, Do you not know that the prince of this world has been judged?  He is no lord, no prince any more.  You have a different, a stronger Lord, Christ, who has overcome and bound him!"

Conclusion
We believe that we are children of God because God has given us life and daily renews our life and has promised us eternal life. As children of God we have a unique relationship with our world and the people around us. God is described by Jesus in his prayer as “our father.” This is prayer is personal of course, but its not individual. In Jesus day, the idea that the individual is above the community would have been foreign and strange. We pray as a community and we pray for each other as a family that needs each other and cares deeply for each other, even in times of conflict. We all know how important it is to spend time together. This is how relationships are built. It is the same with God.

It is said that President Roosevelt always found time for his kids. Even while he was building the Panama Canal, in the summer of 1905, and preparing for his peace talks, he made sure to in the summer of 1905 to take his annual family camping trip. Later, he wrote to his son, “no matter how things come out, the really important thing was the lovely life with mother and you children, and that compared to this home life everything else was of very small importance from the standpoint of happiness.” The Roosevelt home was known for its energy. Roosevelt encouraged his kids to play, explore, he taught his son to shoot, swim, row, ride, and live an active life. It is said that another parenting lesson comes from President Obama. While loving his kids, he also provided discipline, “part of that involves loving those kids to death but also letting them know, “I am your parent, Im not your best friend. I am not interested in what your friends are doing. This is what you're doing in our house.” He also went on to say, that we much as possible, when they were home, they made it a point to not watch television during dinner. They turned off their cell phones and had a conversation. 3

This is how it is with God too. Sometimes we just need to turn off our computers, electronic devises, ipods, tv's etc and take a moment for some family time with God. Whether its reading scripture, sitting in quite meditation and reflection, journaling, and praying, these are ways that we build and nurture our relationship with God. The “Lord's Prayer” stands as a model for us to use when we come to God to spend time together. Through the working of God's life giving Spirit, we can become more and more like the image of God and reflect the best of our heavenly parent.

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. Amen.

1https://pastortimlecroy.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/long-ending-lords-prayer/
2http://www.womensordination.org/resources/female-images-of-god-in-the-bible/

3http://www.parent.co/5-fantastic-parenting-lessons-from-us-presidents/