Translate

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Karl Barth's 1962 Visit to the United States: "The goal of human life is not death, but resurrection"

Time magazine April 20, 1962
1962...
The year was 1962, Jackie Robinson would be the first African American elected to the hall of fame, the United States was testing nuclear weapons at the Nevada test site, President John F Kennedy, began a blockade of Cuba, the Beatles released their record "Please, Please Me", in the Stanley Cup the Toronto Maple Leafs would beat the Chicago Blackhawks 4 games to 2, the first US satellite will reach the moon, and the US steel industry would be forced to reduce prices. It was also the year that theologian Karl Barth would make the cover of Time magazine with his first visit to the United States.  

Time would write about Barth "In the 20th century, no man has been a stronger witness to the continuing significance of Christ's death and Christ's return than the world's ranking Protestant theologian, Swiss-born Karl Barth (rhymes with heart).  Barth knows that the Gospel accounts of the Resurrection are not coherent, but he refuses to make the mystery more palatable to human reason by suggesting–as did the great 19th century Theologian D.F. Strauss in his Life of Jesus, that the story of the crucifixion is a "myth."  Instead, Barth argues that the subject of this unique event is God, not man; and only God can know the full truth of his own history.  Man's only road to understanding of this divine history is through faith–faith in the reality and truth of what the Evangelists so incoherently described." p 59

Barth's trip would include a stop in Chicago where he took in an Edward Albee play and a visit to the coffeehouse-nightclub called "Second City".  He received an honorary doctorate of divinity from the University of Chicago and would give five lectures on evangelical theology, which he would then repeat at Princeton Theological Seminary later in his trip.  He would also make a stop to the Gettysburg Civil War battlefield.  

In tribute to Karl Barth's theology, I have included a few excerpts from the Time magazine article, which I found was much like opening a time capsule, and did a fair job introducing Barthian theology to the reading American public of 1962.  

On his writing style, lack of traction, and theology:
"In a way, this lack of a following is a tribute to the originality and individuality of Barth's accomplishments.  His kind of God-thinking has been commonly called "neo-orthodoxy" and "theology of crisis"–label's Barth rejects, since they scarcely define it at all.  Essentially, Barth is a Christological theologian, whose uniquely modern thought centers around ancient realities; faith, the Bible, the church.  He has a philosopher's knowledge of philosophy, but unlike such contemporaries as Tillich or Bultmann, Barth is wary of restating the dogmas of the church in non-traditional language.  His thought is complex, but he nonetheless writes of doctrine in prose that is not far removed from that of the pulpit.  Above all, he writes of the mysterious history of Christ, Knowledge of God is knowledge of God through Christ.  Faith is faith in Christ; the church is the Church of Christ; the Bible is the witness of Christ.  Theologian Hans Frei of Yale calls him "a Christ-intoxiated man."" p60

On his Parish Ministry
"Faced with the problem of how to give meaningful sermons, Barth as a minister discovered that liberal theology of the universities held out no real message to the people.  He also found that expression of Christian belief, in the mind of his rich parishioners was perfectly compatible with economic exploitation.  Shocked by the low wages paid to Safenwil's textiles workers, Barth became an active socialist and earned the nickname the "Red Pastor" for his role in organizing unions, and for such deadpan japes as passing out free frankfurters to rich and poor alike on Christmas morning at the church." p60

On Epistle to the Romans
Published in 1918 and rewritten completely for the second edition in 1921, Barth's Epistles to the Romans, as Karl Adam a Roman Catholic put it, "fell like a bombshell on the playground of the theologians."  Barth attacked the liberal assumption that the Bible expressed man's religious experience of God; instead he said, it contained God's Word to man.  This God–the God of revelation –is a being "wholly other" than man, a God who shouts the divine No to all of man's efforts to reach him through inner emotion or reason…the only bridge to God is the one that God provides–the bridge of faith that can come too man only after he has recognized the futility of his own efforts to meet his Creator." p61

On the rise of the Third Reich
"…after Adolph Hitler established the Third Reich, Barth spoke out in anger against Naziism when it attempted to create new "German Christian" churches in which National Socialist political theories were given the same sanctity as theological dogma.  "This was a nationalist heresy," he assays, "a confusion between God and the spirit of the German nation."  He launched a new magazine to attack the 'heresy' and in 1934 wrote nearly all of the Barmen Declaration–an anti-Nazi protest that claimed the autonomy of the church from all temporal power.  The declaration was signed by 200 leaders of German's Lutheran, Reformed, and Evangelical Unionist Churches." p61

On Infallibility of Scripture
"Barth accepts and welcomes scholarly criticism of the Bible, even when it shows the Scriptures to be full of errors and inconsistencies.  He does not consider the Bible infallible, and he deplores orthodox Protestants who make it into "a paper pope."  Nevertheless, the Bible testifies to God's Word, which is revealed to man through human speech.  The words that the biblical writers use may not always be the appropriate ones, but they must be accepted as words elected by God.  There can be, in Barth's view, no question of "disproving" the authority of the Scriptures, for the church today must take the "risk" of accepting the witness of the early Christians who established the canon of the Scriptures, and the Reformation fathers who revised it.  God still speaks within the Bible; in the light of faith, the church and her theologians must listen and undertake the ever-unfinished task of finding out what He is saying." p62

On Temperance: (Barth quote)
"One may be a nonsmoker, abstainer and vegetarian, yet be called Adolph Hitler"

On Music
"If I ever go to heaven, I would first inquire about Mozart, and only then about Augustine, Thomas, Luther, Calvin and Schleiermacher. " 

On Prayer
"If we do not pray, we fail to realize that we are in the presence of God.  God opens this road to us; he commands us to pray.  Thus it is not possible to say, "I shall pray"or "I shall not pray" as if it were an act according to our own good pleasure"  

On Resurrection
"Resurrection means not the continuation of life, but life's completion.  "We shall be changed (1 Corinthians 15 )which does not mean that a quite different life begins, but that this "corruptible must put on incorruption." Then it will be manifest that "death is swallowed up in victory." That which is sown in dishonor and weakness will rise again in glory and power.  the Christian hope does not lead us away from this life.  It is the conquest of death, not a flight into the Beyond."

On Universal Salvation
In his Institutes, Calvin argued that God has already determined both those who will be saved at the Last Judgment and those who will suffer the eternal pangs of Hell.  Barth says that this belief does not pay sufficient heed to the fact that Christ's death was intended for all men;  Man's ultimate fate is shrouded in mystery, but Barth believers that Christ, the loving Judge could indeed reconcile all the world to the Father.  "I do not preach universal salvation," Barth insists, "What I say is that I cannot exclude the possibility that God would save all men at the Judgment."  

On Barth
"In person, Barth looks like a Hollywood type-cast of a German professor, right down to his scholar's stoop and his thick, dark-rimmed glasses planted far down on his nose.  His conservative suits are usually rumpled and flecked with tobacco from the pipe that seldom is out of his mouth.  Barth is a Calvinist but not a gloomy one; at home he speaks kindly to large dogs and small children (in guttural Swiss-German), displays a mellow, Dutch-uncle patience with puzzled students.  In conversation Barth is full of wisecracks–some pleasantly pixy, some theologian-arch.  once, asked by a stranger on the trolley car if he knew the great Karl Barth, he replied: 'Know him, I shave him very morning!"  p64

"The mysteries of God's Word are hard ones–but they cannot be made more palatable to nonbelievers or to the lukewarm faithful by hiding them in the language formed by man's own wishful thinking.  God speaks; man must listen."  And Barth summons Goethe to warn the church:  

Long, long ago the Truth was found,
A company of men it bound. 
Grasp firmly then–that ancient Truth!      Time 1962

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

For more ministry information visit my web site at the link below


click on this link to visit my web site

The Frequency of the Holy Eucharist



 
If the congregation or denomination that you are a part of does not currently practice either a daily or weekly celebration of The Holy Eucharist in Holy Communion, it may be time to begin to consider why this practice should be adopted.  There are compelling historical, exegetical, theological, and spiritual reasons to do this, and I have summarized a few:

In this article the term The Holy Eucharist refers to the Sacrament; Holy Communion is the reception of the Sacrament, the Service of the Lord's Day, Mass, or Liturgy of the Eucharist- is the Service in which the Sacrament is celebrated, the Lord's Table is reference to both the Sacrament and the reception. 

1.  Holy Communion is a means of grace.

The “means of grace” are the conduit by which God has chosen to communicate divine grace to humanity.  The means of grace are given through the Gospel (the Good News) in Word and Sacrament.  The Holy Spirit works through the means of grace in both Baptism and in the Eucharist (Acts 2:38).  This is the way the message of salvation; forgiveness of sins, faith, and eternal life is born by the Spirit in the lives of those who gather to hear the word proclaimed at worship.  This is also the reason for a close link between Word and Sacrament.  At the service of the Lord’s Day, or Mass, people hear the word proclaimed, receive spiritual encouragement and instruction, the Holy Spirit regenerates faith, and after the word is proclaimed, the Sacraments are given as a seal and pledge.  Holy Communion should not be divorced from the service of the word rather the two should be kept together.   Jesus is present in both the sermon and in the breaking of the bread and through the Holy Spirit offers us grace and calls us to discipleship and obedience.  It is in the mysteries of the sacraments that we are united in Christ to God, and with each other as one body in Christ.  This is a holy mystery, and one that we need to reminded of frequently at the Lord's Table.  

2. Holy Communion is also our grateful response of joy to God's grace.

There are three accounts of Jesus’ instituting Holy Communion recorded by the three gospels (Matt 26:26-29, Mark 14:22-25, and Luke 22:15-20).  Perhaps the earliest written account comes from St. Paul’s letter to the Corinthians (1 Cor 11:23-25).  This ritual was established by Jesus as a sign of the New Covenant established in Jesus’s death and resurrection.  Each passage links the New Covenant with Jesus crucifixion and resurrection.  Jesus was celebrating the Passover with his disciples, a ritual which commemorated God's deliverance of his people from the slavery of Egypt to the liberating freedom in God.  Jesus transformed the Passover meal into a remembrance of his death and resurrection as the Passover lamb that frees us from the slavery to sin.  Christian worship is a celebration of the inauguration of this New Covenant.  This is the culmination of God’s actions in our world in Jesus Christ and we are invited to be participants in the table-fellowship of the New Covenant.  This is the place where we meet the risen Christ and are given the opportunity to respond in grateful joy to this gift.  The word Eucharist comes from the Greek word, which means, “to give thanks”.   Celebrating the Eucharist in Holy Communion is an opportunity to respond to the proclamation of the word with a joyful and grateful prayer of thanksgiving each time the word is proclaimed and heard.  It is from this place of gratitude that our life of discipleship and obedience emerges, grows, and is sustained.  

3.  Holy Communion is essential to our spiritual growth.

Holy Communion is a mystery and there are both seen and unseen aspects to the meal at the Lord's Table.  A Sacrament is a concrete, visible sign of a spiritual reality and a means of grace.  When we participate in Holy Communion we are living the reality of being in union with Jesus Christ through the Holy Spirit.  Believing congregants are part of the Communion Sanctorum, the “Communion of Saints”, united not only with the Christ but with one another and those that have died.  This gives our lives a on new spiritual dimension.  How can we hold on to our feelings of hatred, racism, classism, our dislike towards others, when we are at the same time receiving the love, grace and acceptance of God?  How can we remain divided when we proclaim the unity of the body of Christ?  The work of the Spirit in the Word continues in the mystery of Holy Communion where we meet the risen Christ.  Holy Communion then becomes both a proclamation, a witness, and an aid to our spiritual growth.  The presence of Christ in the fellowship of the meal and the presence of other believers serves as a living witness to what we proclaim in our Christian worship.  One of the reasons that the confession of sin is essential as a part of Christian worship is that our movement from being called to worship, acknowledging our failure, hearing God's Word for us and responding in humility, all function in worship to bring us to a place of receiving God's grace with open palms.     

4.  It was the practice of the early Christian communities to have Holy Communion weekly if not daily.

Acts 2:42 and Acts 20:7 both attest to the importance and the frequency that early Christian communities placed on the celebration of the Eucharist in Holy Communion.  Justin Martyr in his first Apology provides one of the earliest descriptions of Christian worship practice.  Writing to the Roman emperor Titus (138-168 CE) Justin records that “on the day called Sunday, all who live in cities or in the country gather together in one place…when the prayer is ended, bread and wine, and water are brought, and the president in like manner offers prayers and thanksgivings.”(First Apology)  The Didache, an even earlier document witnesses to the breaking of bread taking place on the “Lord’s Day.”  Through the early Middle Ages the practice continued of weekly communion although not entirely consistent.  It was not until the Middle Ages that the practice began to drop off considerably.  We have to consider not only that the early Christians placed this priority on the Eucharist, but further why they must have done so?  The early Christian congregations were communities that suffered alienation and persecution and were threatened by doctrinal schisms.  Aside from the command of Jesus and the theological implications, the fact that they valued the Eucharist may have given them both a sense of preserving their beliefs as well as a solidarity and spiritual fellowship together.  It must have had a strong part in sustaining them in their most difficult times.  


5.  Influential Christian leaders in the last five hundred years, including the Reformers recognized the importance of weekly celebration of Holy Communion.

John Calvin stated the following regarding the weekly celebration of the Eucharist:

"What we have so far said of the Sacrament abundantly shows that…it was ordained to be frequently used among all Christians in order that they might frequently return in memory to Christ’s Passion, by such remembrance to sustain and strengthen their faith, and urge themselves to sing thanksgiving to God and to proclaim his goodness…. The Lord’s Table should have been spread at least once a week for the assembly of Christians, and the promises declared in it should feed us spiritually…. All, like hungry men, should flock to such a bounteous repast." (Institutes of the Christian Religion John T. McNeill ed Ford Lewis Battles trans Library of Christian Classics (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1960 [1559]) IV.xvii.44, 46

Martin Luther in Germany likewise recommended the frequent practice of Holy Communion (Letter to Lazarus Spengler 1528), and the practice was also encouraged by the Roman Catholic Church in Pope Pius IX, Leo XIII and officially embraced by the Church with Pius X. (Catholic Encyclopedia “Frequent Communion”)

6.  Weekly Holy Communion makes the practice meaningful.

One argument often used for not celebrating the Lord's Table weekly is that frequent communion will somehow lessen its meaning, make it less special.  However, the same thing could be said for any element in Christian worship including the sermon, hymns, music, or even the worship service itself.  Why not offer worship services or a sermon only once a month to keep it special?  The sermon we say must be essential, for it offers encouragement, but that is the point, so does Holy Communion.  Furthermore, the danger that people will not take the Lord's Table seriously extends to every aspect of Christian worship.  The reality is that the meaning of The Lord's Table itself can become lessened whether it is done weekly; monthly, quarterly, or yearly.  Why not re-engage the Sacraments in a more meaningful way, to explore its deep and rich meaning, so that the Lord's Table will be appreciated and better understood.  Everything that happens in the Service of the Lord's Day, our union with God, forgiveness or sins, the gospel, the presence of Christ, the work of the Spirit, are embodied at the Lord's Table.  Once we begin to delve into the rich meaning and mystery of the Sacrament can we begin to connect with how these practices inform our faith, life and belief.


Sermon Easter Day

The Holy Spirit is too often absent from our theology, too often missing from the Easter proclamation.  The doctrine of the trinity is not a scholastic, heady, or impersonal theology, God as the divine trinity is critical to the Christian understanding of life and worship.  Jesus came proclaiming the message of the Kingdom of God as a kingdom of God's grace, love, and peace.  Jesus also is our peace, is God's grace, and is himself the embodiment of God's love.  In Jesus' absence, he promises the gift of the Spirit of God, which supported Jesus throughout his own ministry from his birth, baptism, temptations, ministry, death and resurrection.  The Spirit empowers, comforts, leads and directs Christians not as human experience of emotion, but as the spirit of God; the revealer of scripture and truth.  In this sermon we review the text when Jesus breathes on his disciples imparting the Spirit in his easter appearance and tasking them with proclaiming the message of the forgiveness of sins.  We are called by the power of the Spirit to live in humility and repentance and to proclaim this message of forgiveness and reconciliation to God.  Here Jesus gives the authority to the church to proclaim this message but only through the Holy Spirit of God.

click here to listen to the sermon "The Spirit of Easter"